Battery Elimination Creates Large New Markets 2026-2046

from US$4,900.00

PDF Download Report

Single User License - Allowing one user access to the product.

Site License - Allowing all users within a given geographical location of your organisation access to the product.

Enterprise License - Allowing all employess within your organisation access to the product.

User License Type:

PDF Download Report

Single User License - Allowing one user access to the product.

Site License - Allowing all users within a given geographical location of your organisation access to the product.

Enterprise License - Allowing all employess within your organisation access to the product.

Sample Pages

Contents List

  • 1.1 Purpose and scope of this report

    1.2 Methodology of this analysis

    1.3 Primary conclusions

    1.4 Battery current challenges and why alternatives are being adopted

    1.4.1 General situation in electronics and electrical engineering

    1.4.2 Lithium-ion battery fires are ongoing emitting toxic gas

    1.4.3 Energy storage decision tree with battery-free examples

    1.4.4 Battery emerging challenges 2026-2046

    1.4.5 Battery challenges for 6G Communications and IoT and action arising 2026-2046

    1.5 Battery-free options: eliminating storage or using alternative storage 2026-2046

    1.6 Battery elimination trend from sensors to GW power

    1.7 Battery elimination options beyond drop-in replacement by battery-less storage devices

    1.7.1 Electronics, telecommunication, electrical engineering

    1.7.2 To the rescue: WPT, WIET, SWIPT evolution to 2046

    1.7.3 Evolution of wireless electronic devices needing no on-board energy storage 1980-2046

    1.7.4 13 primary energy harvesting technologies compared

    1.8 Infogram: 13 escape routes from grid LDES 2026-2046

    1.9 Infogram: Escape routes from data center microgrid and similar LDES 2026-2046

    1.10 Battery-less storage device toolkit 2025-2045 with SWOT appraisals

    1.10.1 Options by size

    1.10.2 Example: Lithium-ion capacitor LIC market positioning by energy density spectrum

    1.10.3 Long duration energy storage LDES toolkit for grids, microgrids, 6G base stations, data centers 2026-2046

    1.10.4 Possible scenario: stationary storage batteries vs alternatives TWh cumulative 2026-2046

    1.10.5 Duration hours vs power delivered by project and 12 technologies in 2026

    1.10.6 System strategies to achieve less or no storage: combine and compromise

    1.10.7 Enablers of self-powered, battery-free devices that can be combined

    1.10.6 12 SWOT appraisals of the battery-less device toolkit

    1.11 Roadmaps 2026-2046

    1.12 Market forecasts 2026-2046 in 35 lines

    1.12.1 Energy storage device market battery vs batteryless $ billion 2025-2046

    1.12.2 Battery-less storage for electricity-to-electricity $ billion 2025-2046 in 11 lines

    1.12.3 Battery-less storage for pulse and fastest response $ billion 2025-2046 in 4 lines

    1.12.4 LDES market in 9 technology categories $ billion 2026-2046 table, graphs, explanation

    1.12.5 Total LDES value market % in three size categories 2026-2046 table, graph, explanation

    1.12.6 Regional share of LDES value market % in four regions 2026-2046 table, graph, explanation

    1.12.7 Market for seven types of equipment fitting battery-free storage $ billion 2025-2046

  • 2.1 Overview

    2.2 Battery limitations

    2.3 How lithium-ion battery fires are ongoing

    2.4 Megatrends of electrification, battery adoption and battery elimination

    2.5 Implications for storage 2026 – 2046

    2.6 Duration vs power of many battery and batteryless stationary storage technologies deployed and deploying in 2025 showing future trends

    2.7 How batteries will lose share 2026-2046

    2.8 LDES need and design principles

    2.8.1 Energy fundamentals

    2.8.2 Racing into renewables with rapid cost reduction: 2025 statistics and trends

    2.8.3 Solar winning and the intermittency challenge

    2.8.4 Adoption of LDES of increasing duration driven by increased wind/solar percentage and cost reduction

    2.8.5 LDES definitions and needs 2.8.6 LDES metrics

    2.8.7 LDES projects in 2025-6 showing leading technology subsets

    2.8.8 LDES impediments, alternatives and investment climate

    2.8.9 LDES toolkit

    2.8.10 Latest independent assessments of performance by technology

    2.8.11 Leading reports on LDES 2026-2046

    2.8.12 Example: Installed and committed stationary storage projects 2026 showing many battery and battery-less options competing

  • 3.1 Overview

    3.1.1 Battery elimination options beyond drop-in replacement by battery-less storage devices

    3.1.2 Strategies to achieve less or no storage

    3.1.3 Enablers of self-powered, battery-free devices that can be combined

    3.2 Backscatter with SWOT

    3.2.1 Electronic Article Surveillance EAS , passive RFID and beyond

    3.2.2 SWIPT AmBC and CD-ZED for 6G Communications and IOT

    3.2.3 SWOT and 34 other advances in

    3.3 Circuit design to minimise batteries

    3.3.1 Battery elimination circuits BEC in drones and electric cars

    3.3.2 Intermittency tolerant electronics: BFree

    3.4 Battery reduction and elimination by V2G, V2H, V2V and vehicle charging directly from solar panels

    3.5 Demand management: storage-free solar desalinators

    3.6 Source management advances

    3.7 Specification compromise eliminates batteries

    3.7.1 Battery-free drones as sensors and IOT

    3.7.2 Battery-free cameras

    3.8 Energy harvesting eliminating batteries

    3.8.1 Overview and 13 primary energy harvesting technologies compared

    3.8.2 Elements of a harvesting system

    3.8.3 Mechanical harvesting including acoustic in detail

    3.8.4 Harvesting of electromagnetic energy in detail

    3.8.5 Importance of flexible laminar energy harvesting 2026-2046

    3.9 Escape routes from Long Duration Energy Storage LDES

    3.9.1 General situation with two infograms

    3.9.2 Examples across the world: Denmark, Singapore, China, USA

    3.9.3 Capacity factor of wind, solar and options that need little or no LDES

    3.9.4 Extensive 2025 research on LDES escape routes

    3.9.5 Research in 2025 on Home Energy Management Systems coping with

  • 4.1 Conventional PHES overview

    4.1.1 Three options

    4.1.2 History, environmental, timescales, potential sites, DOE appraisal

    4.1.3 Site-limited primarily due environmental concerns not number of appropriate topologies

    4.1.4 Problem analysis, actions to reduce PHES emissions, ugliness, water use, cost

    4.2 Research advances and view of potential through 2025

    4.3 Projects and intentions across the world

    4.3.1 Geographical

    4.3.2 Large pumped hydro schemes worldwide

    4.4 Economics

    4.5 Policy recommendations

    4.6 Parameter appraisal of conventional pumped hydro PHES

    4.7 SWOT appraisal of conventional pumped hydro PHES

    4.8 Advanced pumped hydro does not need mountains

    4.8.1 APHES overview with SWOT

    4.8.2 Using mining sites including research advances through 2025-6

    4.8.3 Pressurised underground: Quidnet Energy USA

    4.8.4 Using heavier water up mere hills: RheEnergise UK

    4.8.5 Using seawater or other brine: Cavern Energy, Sizable Energy, others, SWOT

    4.8.6 StEnSea Germany, Ocean Grazer Netherlands

    4.8.7 SWOT appraisal of underwater energy storage for LDES

    4.8.8 Hybrid technologies: research advances in 2024 and 2025

    4.8.9 Research advances in 2024 and 2025

  • 5.1 Overview including research in 2025

    5.1.1 General

    5.1.2 Three stages of operation

    5.1.3 Three geometries

    5.1.4 Pumped hydro gravity storage compared to the three SGES options

    5.1.5 Basics

    5.1.6 SWOT appraisal of solid gravity storage SGES for LDES

    5.1.7 Parameter appraisal of solid gravity energy storage SGES for LDES

    5.1.8 CAPEX challenge

    5.1.9 Challenge of ongoing expenses

    5.1.10 Possibility of pumping sand

    5.1.11 Hydraulic piston lift instead of cable: 2025 modelling

    5.1.12 Appraisal of other SGES research through 2025

    5.2 ARES USA

    5.3 Energy Vault Switzerland, USA and China, India licensees

    5.4 Gravitricity

    5.5 Green Gravity Australia

    5.6 SinkFloatSolutions France

  • 6.1 Overview including research advances announced in 2025

    6.1.1 Basics

    6.1.2 Research advances in 2025

    6.2 Undersupply attracts clones

    6.3 Market positioning of CAES

    6.4 SWOT appraisal and parameter comparison of CAES for LDES

    6.5 CAES technology options

    6.5.1 Thermodynamic

    6.4.2 Isochoric or isobaric storage

    6.4.3 Adiabatic choice of cooling is winning

    6.6 CAES projects, subsystem manufacturers, objectives, research 2025 onwards

    6.6.1 Overview: largest projects are in China

    6.6.2 Siemens Energy Germany

    6.6.3 MAN Energy Solutions Germany

    6.6.4 Increasing the CAES storage time and discharge duration

    6.6.5 Research in UK and European Union 2025 onwards

    6.7 Profiles of CAES company progress with Zhar Research appraisals

    6.7.1 ALCAES Switzerland

    6.7.2 APEX CAES USA

    6.7.3 Augwind Energy Israel

    6.7.4 Keep Energy Systems UK formerly Cheesecake

    6.7.5 Corre Energy Netherlands

    6.7.6 Huaneng Group China

    6.7.7 Hydrostor Canada

    6.7.8 LiGE Pty South Africa

    6.7.9 Storelectric UK

    6.7.10 Terrastor Energy Corporation USA

  • 7.1 Overview and research advances in 2025

    7.2 Research advances in 2025 and 2024

    7.3 Lessons of failure: Siemens Gamesa, Azelio, Steisdal, Lumenion

    7.4 The heat engine approach proceeds: Echogen USA

    7.5 Use of extreme temperatures and photovoltaic conversion

    7.5.1 Antora USA

    7.5.2 Fourth Power USA

    7.6 Marketing delayed heat and electricity from one plant

    7.6.1 Overview

    7.6.2 MGA Thermal Australia

    7.6.3 Malta Inc Germany

  • 8.1 Overview with research progress in 2025-6

    8.1.1 Overview

    8.1.2 Sweet spot for chemical intermediary LDES but safety issues

    8.1.3 Mainstream research through 2025-6

    8.1.4 Research dreaming of niches through 2025-6

    8.1.5 Research on complex mechanisms for hydrogen loss

    8.1.6 Research on hydrogen leakage causing global warming

    8.1.7 Examples of hydrogen storage advances 2025-6

    8.2 Parameter appraisal of hydrogen storage for LDES

    8.3 SWOT appraisal of hydrogen, methane, ammonia for LDES

    8.4 The small number of actual projects

    8.4.1 Calistoga Resiliency Centre USA 48-hour microgrid

    8.4.2 Ulm University microgrid trial Germany 2025-2027

    8.4.3 China plans in 2025 and 2026

    8.5 Calculations showing H2ES best only for seasonal storage, needed later

    8.6 Calculations with other conclusions partly due to lack of operating data

    8.7 Candidate technologies for hydrogen storage within LDES systems

  • 9.1 The place of capacitors and their variants

    9.2 Spectrum of choice – capacitor to supercapacitor to battery

    9.3 Research pipeline: pure supercapacitors

    9.4 Research pipeline: hybrid approaches

    9.5 Research pipeline: pseudocapacitors

    9.6 Actual and potential major applications of supercapacitors and their derivatives

    9.6.1 Overview

    9.6.2 Aircraft and aerospace

    9.6.3 Electric vehicles: AGV, material handling, car, truck, bus, tram, train

    9.6.4 Grid, microgrid, peak shaving, renewable energy and uninterrupted power supplies

    9.6.5 Medical and wearables

    9.6.6 Military: Laser cannon, railgun, pulsed linear accelerator weapon, radar, trucks, other

    9.6.7 Power and signal electronics, data center instant recovery

    9.6.8 Welding

    9.7 103 supercapacitor companies assessed in 10 columns

    9.8 Lithium-ion capacitors and other battery-supercapacitor hybrid BSH storage

    9.8.1 Definitions and choices

    9.8.2 BSH market positioning and choices and LIC market positioning by energy density spectrum

    9.8.3 Infograms: the most impactful market needs, comparative solutions, 13 conclusions

    9.8.4 Research analysis and recommendations 2025-2045

    9.8.5 Two SWOT appraisals and roadmap 2025-2045

From 2026-2046, the electrical energy storage market will more than triple but the battery-less storage part will surge to a massive $410 billion - about 40% from 20% today. Time to look beyond batteries. On cue we have the new Zhar Research 546-page report, “Battery Elimination Creates Large New Markets 2026-2046” detailing this massive opportunity.

Within 20 years the battery value market will saturate due to vicious price wars, the largest application – electric cars – levelling and the inability of batteries to perform to the requirements of important new, fast-growing markets. These include months of grid, data center and microgrid storage, and pulsing new electromagnetic weapons and nuclear fusion power. Increasingly, batteryless storage is safer, with much longer life and able to provide lower Levelised Cost of Storage LCOS in the growth applications. Already, pumped hydro alone sells at over $50 billion yearly.

Another emerging multi-billion-dollar market will be for new systems that eliminate energy storage completely, such as planned 6G Communications Phase Two using backscatter for client devices. Wearables adopt multi-mode energy harvesting. Uniquely, this report appraises the commercial opportunity for all this with 133 company batteryless activity profiles.

The Executive Summary and Conclusions (58 pages) is sufficient  for those with limited time. Here are the basics, methodology, key conclusions, technology comparisons, ongoing battery limitations, emerging large batteryless applications, 12 SWOT appraisals of the toolkit and 35 forecasts as tables and graphs with explanation. The Introduction (36 pages) details energy fundamentals, ongoing battery limitations. Understand why batteries will retain the dominant share of energy storage value markets 2026-2046 but lose share rapidly. Grasp emerging applications that batteries poorly address such as coping with long intermittency of wind and solar power everywhere. See the performance parameters of current batteryless solutions against batteries.

The rest of the report presents a through investigation of escape routes from batteries and sometimes from all energy storage. Specific batteryless technologies  are detailed including research advances through 2025-6. The 78 pages of Chapter 3 closely examine “Escape routes from batteries: backscatter (EAS, RFID, 6G SWIPT), battery elimination circuits, other electronics options, LDES escape routes”. Understand increasing deployment of escape routes from batteries and energy storage generally and the heroic future plans. The largest deployment of electronics in numbers is passive RFID tags and their subset anti-theft tags, none with energy storage.  Next, their backscatter principle will be applied to 6G Communications client devices such as internet of things IOT tags also in tens of billions of units. See how the intermittency of wind and solar power can be sometimes tolerated and other times reduced without storage.

Chapter 4. Pumped hydro: conventional PHES and advanced APHES (74 pages) presents what is already selling at over $50 billion yearly, the improvements ahead including avoiding the need for mountainsides and the use of seawater. Realise that this takes the batteryless opportunity beyond massive grid storage to smaller applications. See the activities and intentions of key companies involved and 2025-6 research papers.

Chapter 5. Solid gravity energy storage SGES (37 pages) involves lifting weights instead of water as an improvement on grid batteries. Invented in Europe, it is most energetically pursued in China, initially as many huge buildings providing hours of grid storage but potentially even seasonal. See latest research and structures and the ongoing work on variants, including company profiles of use in mines in Europe and Australia.

Chapter  6. Compressed air energy storage CAES has 64 pages because there are ten companies profiled and widespread use worldwide mainly in huge underground caverns for hours of duration and potentially months (beyond batteries). So far, CAES is the strongest pumped hydro competitor. Contrast Chapter 7. Thermal energy storage for delayed electricity ETES where only four companies can be profiled and lessons of a number of exits are presented. Some new proponents have pivoted to combined heat and power or to thermovoltaic versions with white heat. Understand one large commercial version of ETES in Alaska using heat pumps.

Chapter 8. Hydrogen and other chemical intermediary LDES explains how use of intermediary chemical production and then converting it all back to electricity is very inefficient but hydrogen is more attractive than other gases for this. Enthusiasm for the Hydrogen Economy meets serious challenges of safety, leaking through everything and indirectly causing global warming. Use in salt caverns is strongly advocated by the Royal Society in the UK and many other eminent bodies because it can delay the most GWh, they say even seasonally. However, large H2ES projects are not being funded beyond China on hydrogen generally with electricity-to-electricity as a back story. See the small microgrid application in the USA using overground tanks for 24-hour duration and future plans.

Primary author and CEO of Zhar Research Dr Peter Harrop advises, “From all this it is clear that batteries are losing the extremes of grid storage and pulse/ fast charge-discharge applications so the report ends with the latter toolkit – essentially supercapacitors and their variants - in detail.”

Chapter 9. “Electrostatic storage: Supercapacitors, pseudocapacitors, lithium-ion capacitors, other BSH” is the longest chapter at 118 pages because 103 companies are profiled plus a deep dive into the strongly emerging needs including massive banks pulsing nuclear fusion power. Sections cover aircraft and aerospace; electric vehicles: AGV, material handling, car, truck, bus, tram, train; grid, microgrid, peak shaving, renewable energy, uninterrupted power supplies, medical and wearables. Importantly see military: laser cannon, railgun, pulsed linear accelerator weapon, radar, trucks, other pulse-power electronics, data center instant emergency power, welding, pulse metal forming. Since most of the big applications emerge late in the 2026-2046 timeframe, the forecasts only take this to around $14 billion. Add a  minor part of the regular capacitor business of around $70 billion at that time. However, there is considerable upside potential on these forecasts.

The new Zhar Research 548-page report, “Battery Elimination Creates Large New Markets 2026-2046” is your essential source of opportunities and latest research in this exciting emerging business serving the future – from nuclear fusion power to AI data centers, smart grids and microgrids.